The 'NETWROKED CONSUMER'

Interesting article on trends in types of consumers and the fluidity of the Networked consumer - MediaPost.

Some evolving consumer trends identified in the article:
Identity Flux: Gender-neutrality goes mainstream. People list skills on their business cards rather than title. They dress up in various costumes, depending on who they feel like being that day.

Liquid Brands: Chameleon-like brands focus less on communicating a static message and more on being the right thing for the right persona at the right time. Constantly morphing retailers carry products until they sell out, and never restock.

Virtual Immortality: While some let their avatars drift away to online purgatory, many more leave behind specific instructions on how their virtual selves should proceed. Services offering avatar surrogates flourish, and we bequeath avatars to friends and family in our wills.

Environmental Movement: Companies are expected to reduce the amount of damage they are doing to our minds. Savvy companies sponsor marketing-free white spaces in lieu of polluting the environment with models and logos.

Product Placement: Enviro-biographies are attached to just about everything, letting consumers know the entire life story of a product: where the materials were harvested, where it was constructed, how far it traveled, and where it ended up after being thrown away or recycled.
Brand-Aides: Socially responsible brands make a buck while providing desperately needed services. Communities are revived by Target daycare, Starbucks learning centers and Avis transportation services for the elderly.

Moral Status Anxiety: A person's net worth is no longer measured by dollars earned, but by improvements made. Families compete with each other on how many people they fed while on vacation, and the most envied house on the block is not the biggest, but the most sustainable.

Oldies but Goodies: Respect for elders makes a comeback in the form of Ask Your Grandma hotlines. The proliferation of online video clips by seniors show us how to tie knots and concoct home remedies.

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Never Eat Alone

Just read the excerpt on 'Never Eat Alone' a book for all those who understand and believe you are worth your network. FastCompany has the excerpt published...

Navel-Gazers...

Article glorifying the interest in blogs, bloggers and their perspectives from Market-Watch

Navel-gazers will be the stars in 2007
Commentary: Your expertise is in vogue and exploited

They are out to get me!!

Recently I had the opportunity to seek honest, open feedback and guess what I got? People paranoid and scared and wanting to stay anonymous. I wonder why? I brain stormed and guess what I came up with?
  • Don’t believe in ‘The Golden Rule’
  • Questionable maturity
  • Questionable perception of the world in light of personal maturity
  • Conspiracy theorists lack of overall trust
  • Low self value perception

Hail to the conspiracy theorists. I strongly believe feedback needs to be transparent so that the individual who is being reviewed knows what is being said about her/him. It provides the individual an opportunity to defend themselves if need be, especially if they have been misinterpreted. In addition it ensures constructive feedback.

Most people are slaves of their experiences and as long as they continue to associate with people who target them for their opinions, responses and behaviors it may be impossible to break the shackles. It takes effort to break the mold.

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

Find Their Calling

Fancy article...

"The match between your employees' values and the organization or team's values is a more powerful factor by far than money in keeping good people," write Beverly Kaye and Sharon Jordan-Evans in their latest Fast Company Talent Resource Center Column.

Out of Sight – Out of Mind

Marketing will live for ever! As long as the human mind does not change, Marketing is here to stay. I started this essay with a whole different thought in mind…

I was trying to pen down (it is crazy to use the phrase “pen down”, although I do write the frame work of my essay on paper before I type it up in its entirety) my experiences about people and our strategic goals. It is amazing how we do stupid things that don’t add value or align with our goals more often than not? Obviously strategy is not a goal! But none the less it needs to be a map of what we want to be and where we want to go.

I made a list of things I believe I need:
· Entrepreneurial spirit – Leadership experiences
· Selling & Marketing skills – Communication skills
· Learning & Updating skills – Knowing what’s new and learning it
· Valuation & Measurement – ROI on the investment in learning
· Networking – “No man is an island”, John Donne
· Strategies that link to long term goals – The map

Yet in my every day they don’t align? May be I need to hire personal career and goal marketers to help advertise to my mind. Some on who constantly and subliminally makes impressions of my goals and induces me to check every task with the six points above?

Oh My God!!

What's next? We already have...

Teens
Tweens
Boomers
Gen X
Gen Y
Millennials
Meterosexuals
+
+
Jetrosexuals

from FastCompany

Monday, December 18, 2006

Addressing a Business Need

Every meeting I have ever participated focuses on a business need, of course who wants to waste time chit chatting? I certainly don’t! I’ve go better things to do in life, be some place, do something, live life, enjoy it. Yet day after day folks talk about addressing a business need. I wonder if they talk about the same at a non-profit. I hope that don’t or at least they focus on societal needs versus the ‘chit-chat’? In any case the thought or the comment that sparked this essay was actually quite mundane. We were discussing a strategic opportunity and it boiled down to who needs to use the system and how they should to be trained.

Some one suggested lets position the training as a business need that the users will be addressing versus communicating as a training to use a process/system. What a brilliant idea! I thought for a second… either the organization has hired a bunch of order takers who do not logically process information or lack the leadership to challenge directives. Don’t you think they will make the leap from what is told and what is expected? I don’t expect any and every one to be able to bridge the operational and tactical into the strategic vision. People do need hand holding and sometimes even connecting of the dots, but this one is too obvious don’t you think? .And if they don’t want to get on the bus (or get to the same destination) we are better off without them in the first place.

Friday, December 15, 2006

Asking the tough question!

Just noticed this article on Fortune.

Are You Making Too Much Money?

I found the following insightful questions in the article...
  • How does our pay compare to the competition in total, not just salary?
  • Was our management team outperforming the competition?
  • And was this related to their specific performance or just being in the right place at the right time?
  • To what extent does our pay vary with performance?
  • Do we have enough variability in that pay, or are we building in expense that will hurt us if and when the next retail downturn comes?
  • And what principles should guide the value sharing between management and staff and the shareholder?
Questions from Alison Winters chair of Nordstrom's compensation committee to their board.

Thursday, December 14, 2006

Branding in China

Interesting article in this morning's Knowledge@Wharton News letter:

How and Why Chinese Firms Excel in 'The Art of Price War'

Equity building and Equity erosion is a huge debate but it is a tough call to pull back on the pricing related sales fundamental.

"In China, where companies have earned a reputation for starting price
wars, the outbreak of a price war is considered a legitimate and effective
business strategy.
"

Wharton marketing
professor Z. John Zhang

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Choosing Your Own Parents

At a recent presentation I heard a speaker comparing the idea of ‘accepting your corporate leaders’ akin to ‘accepting your own parents’. The thought got me thinking, I wondered if I buy into the concept but I guess it is true to a large extent… although with certain caveats.

I trust my parents but I will evaluate and screen every suggestion or recommendations they make! I believe it is absolutely stupid to entrust ones destiny into some one else’s hands. Not even your parents and obviously not your leaders. I do agree and accept you inherit some traits from your parents much like I have learnt a lot from my leaders, but it is eventually up to us to make the most of what we have or what we acquired! I love Mark Twain’s quote “Put all your eggs in one basket and-WATCH THAT BASKET”. If need be don’t hesitate to break the basket.

Scientifically choosing your “parents” may still be some time away and by laws of nature not sure ever really possible. I won’t say the same about my leaders…. If things get really bad disown them, change ships or better yet take reigns into your own hands (there is a lot of news on LBOs lately).

Monday, December 11, 2006

Talent Pool

There are 10 ways from Tuesday to skin a cat. So is true in developing a talent pool! Here is a shortlist of verbs that came to mind when started thinking of the talent pool - Acquisition, Development, Transfer, Sharing, Management, etc.

ALIGNMENT is everything. Agreement and alignment on the required skills and competency, expected adaptability, how the organization plans to leverage and foster talent it into the next level?

It is often easy to start with the tactical needs. Small wins and little successes help build credibility. Although the tactical may be lost in the strategic vision? One may soon realize that skills were acquired not talent! Not much different from hiring a consultant to get a task accomplished, that may not have much to do or value to add once the job is done?

It is not just essential to get the right team on the bus like Jim Collins puts it but to make sure they agree and understand the destination. The team must together have the passion and vision to drive the bus home.

ROI - ROI - ROI

ROI - Return on Investment, is the talk of the town. As we start to enforce accountability within the community, ROI has spurred more and more discussion.

Here are a couple article on the topic.

On ROI: Keys to Measurement
Taking Measure: A Need-to-Know Basis

Thursday, December 07, 2006

Extreme Jobs

Just yesterday I referred an article about the talent pool at Goolge and this morning I came across another interesting one about people work hours and NEEDS... Yes NEEDS!

I am a huge proponent of the Dilbert principle OA5.

We are all unique and each and every individual is different. One size, one policy or the same culture does not fit us all!! Some of us seek out the unbalance in the work to challenge them and drive them. Here is an article from FastCompany on Extreme Jobs. About those of us who seek the long hours to stay excited!

Hooked on Work: the Allure of Extreme Jobs

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

I watched it and loved it! - PERSUADERS

PERSUADERS

Interesting documentary by Rushkoff on PBS-Frontline.

Talent Management Challenge

Just noticed the posting on Fortune this morning on Google -

Is Google too smart for its own good?
  • brilliant minds boxed into a big company inevitably grow dissatisfied with their inability to shine individually
  • a team of superstars destined to underachieve

The quotes are very interesting... but that does not mean the pool of talent cannot be managed.

It just needs a smart and creative entrepreneurial environment and an open mind to let it blossom. It has been done before and will continue to be done, will it happen at the 8th wonder of the world is a question for the times?


Hiring: The Lake Wobegon Strategy

Vanity Plates

Interesting article from The Motley Fools -

Top 10 Vanity Plates We'd Like to See
10. NXT PREZ -- Eliot Spitzer (NY Attorney General)
9. APLSCKS -- Steve Ballmer (CEO, Microsoft)
8. ITWRKED -- Ken Lay (Late CEO, of Enron)
7. LUV JUNK -- Meg Whitman (CEO, Ebay)
6. HOTR N MRA -- Liz Claman (NBC, CNBC News Anchor)
5. YRFIRED -- Donald Trump (The Apprentice)
4. IMADETHIS -- Martha Stewart (Martha Stewart Living, Omnimedia)
3. VDKAPEE -- Dennis Kozlowski (TYCO)
2. MTRMOUTH -- Jim Cramer (CNBC, Money Madness)
1. IH8SHRTS -- Patrick Byrne (CEO, Overstock.com)

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Letting Consumers In Is Good For Brand Health

This is new... Improve ROI on your advertising by letting your consumers define and create your advertisements, AMA thinks so!

Letting Consumers In Is Good For Brand Health
Guess how that compares to the recent article about trust in celebrity spokes people... may be the common consumer does not consider a celebrity to be a representative consumer?

Moms Say Advertisers Don't Get Them

Monday, December 04, 2006

Making mistakes & Talking about them

Hind sight is 20:20, and yet it is not very easy to notice our own mistakes, let alone talk about them. It takes tremendous courage to accept your mistake and all the more to acknowledge in public. I recently came across an article in the Knowledge@Wharton news letter “Pitney Bowes' Michael Critelli: Not Your 'Celebrity CEO'”. I did not know much about Pitney Bowes beyond the common knowledge of their mail sorting business. Then I read Good to Great by Jim Collins. I have been very impressed with the company ever since and then this recent article just built on my respect for the leadership at Pitney.

You must read the K&W article for the rest of my essay to make much sense…

While sipping coffee I ruminated over the article and wondered would I have hired Michael after he had been passed for a partner at two firms? And then again would I feel confident in appointing him the chief executive? In all honesty probably not! Not to belittle his potential and his accomplishments but I have always believed success begets success. True we all run into little failures all the time but I am not so sure his were little by any stretch of imagination?

I thought further and develop a hypothesis. It is only worthwhile and/or easy to talk about mistakes until one gets beyond a certain accomplishment level! It is easy for the successful to talk about their mistakes then for those who have failed. It is not only because they learnt from the mistakes and capitalized on them but also because in light of their success their mistakes seem minuscule. On the flip side it could very well be true that the failed individual/s were not lucky enough to have found another opportunity to learn and capitalize on their mistakes? Who is to judge? For me I will only talk when asked.

Friday, December 01, 2006

Emotional Intelligence

We don't just think with our head! We use our entire body in the process. Why does the corporate world expect that we leave our emotional baggage at the office door or even at home when we get to work? The reverse is certainly not true!

I remember days when I was able to get a ton accomplished just because I had a great start to the day at home and on the other end had a crummy day at home only because I have had issues at work.

Wouldn't it be great if we could think with our mind body and soul?

That's no to say we don't maintain professional standards at work but let people express themselves through more than just family photos on their desk. I think we can be a lot more productive if we let more than just the numbers speak for the likely outcome from a venture... how I feel about things, my gut about a decision is often a very strong read of the likely outcome from a decision/action.

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Leadership & Time Management

If there is one thing I believe any leader needs to manage appropriately it is time! Time is a huge competitive advantage. Be it learning and gathering skills; developing talent; managing and building teams; practicing, demonstrating and delivering success. Time is the only sustainable competitive advantage! I have argued with friends, colleagues and partners over numerous cups of coffee only to confirm my hypothesis.

Time can influence everything from where you studied, what you studied, how well you learnt, what you absorbed and what if all bounced off, where you worked, who you know and how well you know them. Infact I believe in the event we had infinite amount of time leadership would be unnecessary. Each one could just practice to perfection. The entire idea of strategizing based on hypothesis, prioritizing and succeeding would be lost in time.

I believe strong leaders are born (just luck!) and those that are made have prudent time management skills. Although I don’t disagree, “It is better to be lucky then to be good”… the lucky ones are wired to manage time to their advantage. For those mathematically inclined time is not a sufficient but a necessary ingredient for leadership.

The Investor's Emotional Bank Account

Years ago I read ‘7 habits of Highly Influential People’, and I believe they are truly timeless! Then this morning I came across an article in Business Week, How to Clean Up a Scandal. Like a good ole Proctoid I thought how about Tide, Gain, Cheer, Era, Dreft for the sensitive ones or may be even Mr. Clean for the really tough ones?

Anyway… our attention span is so short why does it even matter? Let’s just wait a bit. People will forget and things will get back to normal, of course in the short run the street will ignore us, our numbers will suffer but that just means a change of guard until memory fades. Why worry about the investor’s emotional bank account?

The most amazing thing was ‘house cleaning’ that the article talked about that went on as an after affect from the information fall out. How amazing! So the principle is I will dump the parasites from my house, if they go some place else that is not much of my concern? Now that’s a good lesson. Let’s put more gates and bars to trap the problem/parasites in the future and more than that when things go wrong let’s move them out.

Isn’t it time we thought of what has really caused the surge in scandals? Is there a systemic solution? Is this a societal problem?

Brands on Brain

As if we did not have enough metrics to juggle with, we can now start reporting biometric measures during brand equity scans.

Check out this article on Brain response to strong and weak brands. - From Media Post

Monday, November 27, 2006

On New Products: Creativity

Interesting article on Creativity, Marketing & Innovation - Marketing Daily

On New Products: Creativity

innovation and creativity -- Are distinction with a purpose; being relevant yet
different.

creation must be fresh and then filtered through unique points of view (brand equity).

Don't fear creativity. Embrace it, nourish it, and guide it along. Then watch what it does for your bottom line.

Collective Intellect

Transformation of Data -> Information -> Knowledge is a great thing but aren't they all after the same? In any case this turned up when I looked at all those sites that referred to my blog.

Putting blogs to work for Wall Street

My Thanks Giving Prayer for the corporate world!

Thank you for a mind without fear,
Thank you for the wisdom to choose the right people,
Thank you for my network of friends, colleagues and partners,
Thank you for the ability to rationally reason,
Thank you for constant motion and avoiding getting stuck in dead habits,
Thank you for a constant strife for perfection
Thank you for the ability to open the mind to new thoughts and action!

Inspired by Rabindranath Tagore’s Geetangali.

Sunday, November 26, 2006

Simplicity as a strategy

Mommy and Me - from FastCompany

Simplicity as a marketing strategy
Simplicity as a product development strategy

Coaches and CEOs

Very interesting article from FastCompany - Coach For A Day

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

The race to create a 'SMART' Google

Context based search and a stretch to satisfy the lazy man/woman.

The race to create a 'smart' GoogleEverything you buy online says a little bit about you. And if all those bits get put into one big trove of data about you and your tastes? Marketer's heaven.

Fortune Magazine, November 20th, 2006.

The Female CEO ca. 2002

Interesting perspective on Women CEOs from FastCompany

The Female CEO ca. 2002

1. Toxic bosses still create unfriendly work environments.
2. Women's choices are limited: What'll it be? Geisha, bitch, or guy?
3. You can't have it all.
4. Women's new mission: Change the game.
5. Women work differently from men.

The follow through article is just as interesting Where Are the Women?

Note to CMO

Found a reference to it on the ANA blog...
Note to CMO is a very interesting Blog

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Managing disagreement

I hate to say this but I judge people. Well how else would I be able to pick the right team? I judge them based on various behaviors, managing disagreements is a critical one of them. I have always believed ‘we are the experiences we have had’. To that extent we mimic behaviors we have seen from our leaders, our parents, our role models, mentors, coaches, etc. I call it ‘The leader as a diamond’ phenomenon.

As individuals rise through the corporate ladder, they are subjected to the cutting, polishing, measurements that transform the individual into a diamond, a tough strong, sharp leader. Some are too weak and break apart, some have imperfections, some are unfortunately are with the wrong craftsman or the wrong environment and some just don’t have the right stuff, to be a leaders. All disagreements in some form of a placid, laid back life of a rock.

The disagreements shape the future and at the very end it’s the light that the diamond reflects that matters most. Not something it generates but it borrows from around it.

Monday, November 20, 2006

Friday, November 17, 2006

Through the grape vine

Organizations thrive based on personal connections; you want to get Rob your buddy in IT to do something or wait in the queue for days. You need to get the purchase order cleared for a vendor sooner than usual call Jane in finance. Organizations where informal channels are clearer with fewer hurdles strewn around than the formal ones are often more efficient and productive. An organizational culture of informal channels needs a people who know each other well and over long periods of time, additionally the structures need the support from appropriate reward systems for establishing and fostering such networks.

It’s not without risks for informal communication channels. It gets rough when the grape vine starts to evolve into the official channel. By our very nature we develop compensating behaviors to make life easy and grape vines can be funny. Communication is a complicated process particularly because we say what we mean but interpret it based on our background. I have always believed that communication through the grape vine is analogous to translating a proverb through an automated language translator into another language and then taking the translation and translating it back into the original language.

http://translate.google.com/
Where there is a will there is a way
donde hay voluntad de a hay una manera

donde hay voluntad de a hay una manera
where there is will of a is a way

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Respect in the work place

I have often seen RESPECT as an element of the leadership model at corporations. Yet there are many who feel like they are treated like four year old kids. For those without little kids at home, you may not be able to relate to the amount of coaxing and cajoling parents do to their kids to “pick up toys after play”, “sleep on time”, “brush before you sleep”, “shower before you sleep”, “make your bed”, “finish your homework”, etc.

It is not unusual to walk into a work environment and experience the same! This is an extension of micro management but in its own right a matter of basic human RESPECT.

As a human and an associate in a work place, we bring a certain amount of discipline to the work place. It is our background, our ethics and our personality that establish a credibility that we expect coworkers and The Boss to recognize and respect.

When assigned a task The Boss should not need to check every so often if it’s done or not? How far along? Responsibility and authority are like the hand and glove, being given responsibility is being awarded the respect to handle the issue or business challenge. With the responsibility comes the authority to get things done, The Boss, the colleagues/coworkers need to understand and accept this authority. It would be calling “Mommy!” if one has to go to The Boss to get the team to play along on every little thing!

EVERY LEADERSHIP MODEL NEEDS TO INCLUDE RESPECT FOR THE INDIVIDUAL. Each and every individual needs to understand what RESPECT really means!

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Keeping America Competitive

Interesting article on US Competitiveness - Business Week

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

Driving Growth In Consumer Goods

Driving Growth In Consumer Goods
McKinsey Quarterly

Forbes.com

Friday, November 03, 2006

Data is the New Oil

A very intersting post on the ANA blog by Clive Humby of Dunn Humby

Data is the New Oil

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Burger King: Using Social Currency

David Aaker talks about - Relevance, Energy, Clarity, Differentiation, Leverage as principles to build a strong portfolio of brands.

This article from ANA is as close as it gets to that within the BK portfolio. - Burger King: Using Social Currency

Thursday, October 26, 2006

listen to your customers, let them tell you what they want

It is not very typical one comes across two articles that feed off of each other on the same day...

ANA - Consumer Insights - What a Concept
FCNow - gui gouwu zhongxin(Ghost Mall)

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

Do you "Google?"

Google's take on the brand - NOUN vs. VERB?

Technorati Profile

Monday, October 23, 2006

Friday, October 20, 2006

The coefficient of restitution

All those people who ever played golf or studied advanced physics or engineering have definitely heard the term coefficient of restitution. It is a measure of a body’s ability absorb energy… boy, am I getting technical or what? Anyway the thought crossed my mind when I came across an article on work life balance and executive health. There is more to the beating most executives take above and beyond the odd work hours. It is the constant war games, small failures and much the same way small successes.

I wonder if we should have a measure of an individual’s coefficient of restitution included in one of those employment application forms. Wouldn’t it be amazing if and when the board of directors review a candidate for the position of a CEO they ask him/her how much beating can u take?

Unlike most non living things (that are assumed rigid and isotropic) I believe we humans metamorphosize, in our ability to take a beating. Call it thickening of the skin or shamelessness, net-net we do get more resilient and our coefficient of restitution goes up.

The more I think the more I agree we need a measure to evaluate our ability to rebound from setbacks.

Thursday, October 19, 2006

Frying talent

A couple years ago I came across a case study in one of the monthly issues of the Harvard Business Review that was very interesting. A super star that makes the team feel like dirt and what was worse was the individual never acknowledges it and never realizes the long term affects of the behavior demonstrated. The individual is so good that the loss could have a significant effect on the organization.

Firing anyone is not an easy task let alone firing talent. I have quoted the proverb “A bird in hand is worth two in the bush”, but what if the bird in hand is not pretty? There is so much to it… the relationship, the person being affected, the effect on rest of the organization and lastly by no means the least, the effect on company image. Firing is a necessary evil to keep things in check and maintain a balance.

Four mediocre people are worse than one talented individual but one high maintenance individual is not worth the effort. I would say… coach’em, mentor’em and if nothing works fry’em.

Talent acquisition is a continuous process!

Brand Yourself!

Another real good one from Fast Company - Brand Yourself
"first, you have to build expertise. That's the easy part. The more difficult
aspect is getting people to recognize it
."

Friday, October 13, 2006

Numbers to Lose Sleep By

Alarming...

The situation is reflective of the current interest rate combined with our growth hedges.

Read on from Fast Company
Wonder how is it sustainable with the Dow index at record levels? - Beige Book

Stoke the fire, feed the fire or use it as an Incinerator

I did not believe there was a difference between the three. All you really do in either of the scenarios is put stuff in the fire place. It is either the iron or dry logs or just stuff that burns. I put anything and everything from candy wrappers to, wet twigs, dust, dirt, leaves that followed my wet shoes, etc. What’s the big deal I thought? But when I got a big fire place in my house I realized the difference. During my annual cleaning I heard about it from the chimney cleaner. All the soot had layered the chimney.

I thought this is just like people! Treat people the way they deserve they deliver! Treat them like the average person and get mediocrity. It is not rocket science! It is all about how u feed and stoke their passions.

One of the companies I worked for had a very interesting and robust people management system. Every single person started as an average (un-judged) to give the individual room to grow, when it came time to measure and evaluate the individual had plenty of time to prove him or herself. When they proved to be different and better they moved up, when they lost ground they moved off.

It was not unusual to see people who had gone up to slide and yet be rewarded for their potential (the JIT princicple, wait for my next essay) and people who slide to ride the wave again. After all ‘A bird in hand is worth two in the bush’.

Are relationships a replacement to authority?

Organizations are getting more and more complex with crisscrossing reporting lines that look worse than the toy racing car tracks from my childhood. It is not a surprise that the complexity is being balanced by flatter organizations to avoid any communication challenges and ensuing dissemination of information, both up and down the chain of hierarchy.

One must love a certain amount of ambiguity to survive inside the matrix, it can be challenging and stressful but if managed appropriately can create a lot of opportunities and learning from cross interaction. I have always believed it is almost impossible to accomplish anything significant without clarity of role. I have written about it in many of my past essays and decided I needed to revisit the idea. Over time I have built a robust network (my Net work is my Net worth!) and realized there is a lot more to getting things done than authority.

So what is so powerful about the network that matrices lack? Actually nothing! It may just be about the mindset people approach it with. The fundamental difference is authority can be bestowed like a magic pill while relationships take time to build, additionally relationships are tenuous, easy to destroy but tough to build. If one gets the dynamics of the difference relationships could very well be a replacement to authority!

OBD & Thinking Deficiency Disorder

Just noticed a couple interesting articles from FastCompany - Obsessive Branding Disorder
- Wise up

Monday, October 09, 2006

Listening credibility

Ever been in a meeting where some one speaks before they listen? Can be very annoying! This may not come as a surprise to those who have ever been in consulting and thrived in that environment but listening is rather difficult. It takes a special skill to listen; a typical person will create an opinion long before they have heard the entire argument and more times than not blurt out irrelevant or even logically challenging responses to a discussion.

For those familiar with MECE (Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive) I wonder if there are MECE answers to questions. Wouldn’t it be great to be able to answer questions without ever hearing them yet not going wrong? I am not talking about invoking the 5th.

We all need to play politics but I guess it takes more than that to be right.

I recommend instituting a measure of “listening credibility”?

Friday, October 06, 2006

Engagement By Engagement

Interesting blog - Engagement By Engagement

A perspective on Consumer Engagement and developments in the advertising industry's Engagement initiative.

Thursday, October 05, 2006

Hiring for talent not for skills

As easy as it sounds hiring for skills is as tough as asking some one to looking into a fire and predict the future. It can be tough especially in today’s fast paced environment but also absolutely essential in order to ensure any semblance of continuity. One of the most important things I believe we need today is ADAPTABILITY/AGILITY; call it by any other name and it sounds exactly the same!

The mobility to take knowledge and apply to a different business, in a different region and in many cases a different function. Skills are tactical they are like signposts, they rarely ever move, but it would be tough to get to a destination without a signpost.

Hiring for skills is akin to digging a well when one gets thirsty!

As long as one has talent skills can be developed. Organizations hire consultants to meet a tactical need. That’s the perfect place to look for a specific skill! It is a short term need and once met another one may not arise for a while. Talent on the other side transcends functions and projects it is really AGILE!

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

One for one

One for all and all for one? I am not sure I believe in it and that true of leadership too! People are different, each unique with different styles. So I guess there really is no such thing as ‘One for all and all for one’ at least in the corporate world.

Years ago when I interviewed for new jobs I wanted to know as much about ‘The Role’ as possible, through friends, through my network, in some cases from the recruiter, so I knew exactly what to say that would impress the interviewer. Just how to say it in order to engage the listener, I did that for years until recently I realized I am not looking for a job or a career. I don’t mean to say I am not in the market but what I really mean is I am looking for a fit! A place that values my idiosyncrasies and I share common values.

It is impossible to survive in a box, let alone one where you cannot breathe freely?

Tuesday, October 03, 2006

What Ideas Are you Fighting For?

Interesting post on FastNow - What Ideas Are you Fighting For?

Ralph Waldo Emerson said, "The ancestor of action is thought", truly ideas are worth fighting for!

Lead, Follow or Get out of the way… needs revision

A couple years ago I came across the message “Lead, Follow or Get out of the way…” on a school t-Shirt in the Coop. I felt it was a little to arrogant but on second thought it seemed fine given it presented to the reader all the options, be a leader, be a follower, or let others be. And yet I felt it to be a little too harsh.

It is not uncommon these days to run into an exec who one cannot make a decisive choice, then there are those that make choices based on some one else’s options there are those who let others make decisions for them, lastly the ones that won’t question the options or the choices. Churchill said it best, “History will be kind to me for I intend to write it”.

No corporation can ever thrive with weak leadership. I have completed the full circle; yep I accept I am a convert. The way I see it the choice is clear “Lead or Get out of the way!”

Monday, October 02, 2006

Lets add to the confusion!

"If you can't convince them, confuse them." -- Harry Truman

Guess that's what the Marketing research community does best! I guess what we really need is an insight into the payout from knowing more than just knowing more?

Boomer Research Defines Six New Consumer Clusters - From the Marketing Daily.

Hourglass Society

I thought the article was about health consciousness but then realized it was about a transitional society from the young to the old.

You will be judged and valued on the basis of your behavior in relation to
your communities and the environment.


by Karlene Lukovitz, Monday, Oct 2, 2006 5:00 AM ET (Marketing Daily)

I just hope we have not realized this in the last couple weeks and months and that this has been our beacon and guiding principle.

An article worth reading... 'Hourglass Society' Values Community, Ecology

Things I hate the most!

I acknowledge this is obviously not the best way to start a Monday but I felt the need for it.. In any case there’s got to be a balance… the good with the bad, the ying with the yang, a Monday with dark thoughts. So here is a list of the top three things I hate the most.

  • Lack of Integrity
  • Lethargy/Procrastination/Tardiness
  • Lack of Commitment/Focus or Indecision

Sunday, October 01, 2006

Our stories & our communication

what's your brand story? - from ANA

It is the triangulation between: Personal connection - Product efficacy - Wider equity alliances.

Friday, September 29, 2006

Being comfortable with the uncomfortable

It is not easy to be comfortable with things that are unfamiliar and not within the realm of our experiences and background. So what do we mean when we talk about diversity? I hope we have been talking about the invisible diversity, because if not we have been fooling ourselves!

I think as leaders we need a team of people who can think different and question things from multiple different perspectives. I strongly believe as leaders we need to identify and assemble a team of deeply skeptical individuals that can some where along the way hold hand firm and tight. Its like a voyage on a yacht, you question the direction at each point but once the team agrees they all pull the ropes in the same direction with gusto and alongside every one else!

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Cultural fit to me is a match in emotional energy

During each interview I have conducted I have always wondered how I knew if the candidate across from me would fit and thrive in the culture. I have asked that question to myself as a candidate, “would I fit in this culture”? My answers have been often vague, incoherent and not cohesive.

One hour is not enough to know a person let alone to bring some one into your family. All background checks apart there is a lot of a person than where they have been and what they may have done? I am sure we all agree. We would not have been a nation with a 50% divorce rate if that was not half as true. All said and done during a recent conversation I had an epiphany. It seemed apt to mention it in an essay.

Each of us has different responses to different events and episodes, of course we are unique! We are all diverse we think and we act different, it is who we are and it is our personality. That being said I believe we process things on two planes – logical and emotional. Given the binary choice one comes first and the second must follow. Also not one is right in its entirety. It is this sequencing of choices in context of the challenge we are trying to resolve that defines who we are and how we fit within a symphony.

The logical portion of the assessment always results in the same answer independent of who we are and where we come from as long as we provide the same inputs, the beauty of math (I have to add that on account of my analytical background)… the inputs we provide do vary based on whether we have emotionally processed the facts or not (remember the sequencing piece?) our emotional energy varies and is a function of all that is around us not excluding us. So by deduction, fit is emotional energy. That still does not answer the question on how to measure it. Guess I need to think further?

Word smithing and funny business

Interesting Fools post - Career Education CEO Expelled

The article talks about the stock leap of 14.4% with the CEO's sudden departure... partially attributed to the PR statement?

"Current lead director Robert Dowdell will serve as interim CEO while the company seeks a permanent replacement for Larson. But consider how the press release described the situation: "The board of directors is in the final stages of engaging a nationally recognized executive search firm to lead the search for a permanent CEO."

Parse that statement fully, and you'll see it translates roughly as "we're almost ready ... to ask someone else ... to begin looking for a replacement." That suggests to me that Larson's departure was sudden, abrupt, unplanned -- choose the adjective that suits you best, but be aware that words like "calculated," "smooth," or "unpanicked" have no place in this sentence. "

http://www.fool.com/news/mft/2006/mft06092810.htm
By Rich Smith (TMFDitty)09/28/2006

Creativity matters more, not size!

Creativity is more important than just scale and size. - Article from the Media Dailty News

Monday, September 18, 2006

Careers & culture

It is so interesting to note that we (The people of the United States) celebrate the day our founding fathers signed and published the declaration of independence; July 4th, 1776. The war of independence ended in 1782 and the British accepted defeat in 1783 but the Independence Day stands firm at July 4th. The day the nation readied itself to take the mantle of democracy, lead the world and satisfy our citizen’s primary need for freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of action. No don’t get confused I am not trying to make any significant contribution or change historical records through this essay but I am trying hard to make a point!

I was evaluating corporate principles and policies in light of the above…. people often get promoted based on what they have done not the capabilities they project. I had the opportunity to experience a culture, where people were promoted based on successfully completing tasks required by the role versus the role they were preparing for. It does sound much like our educational institutions. Just the way students move up from one grade level to the next on successful completion of tasks within their current grade level.

Alls not lost though…. when it comes to admitting new candidates even educational institutions subjectively measure capability and drive as a proxy to future success.

Corporate culture or the societal culture… your guess is as good as mine.

Careers & culture

It is so interesting to note that we (The people of the United States) celebrate the day our founding fathers signed and published the declaration of independence; July 4th, 1776. The war of independence ended in 1782 and the British accepted defeat in 1783 but the Independence Day stands firm at July 4th. The day the nation readied itself to take the mantle of democracy, lead the world and satisfy our citizen’s primary need for freedom of speech, freedom of religion and freedom of action. No don’t get confused I am not trying to make any significant contribution or change historical records through this essay but I am trying hard to make a point!

I was evaluating corporate principles and policies in light of the above…. people often get promoted based on what they have done not the capabilities they project. I had the opportunity to experience a culture, where people were promoted based on successfully completing tasks required by the role versus the role they were preparing for. It does sound much like our educational institutions. Just the way students move up from one grade level to the next on successful completion of tasks within their current grade level.

Alls not lost though…. when it comes to admitting new candidates even educational institutions subjectively measure capability and drive as a proxy to future success.

Corporate culture or the societal culture… your guess is as good as mine.

Sustainability & Advertising

More than just a spin...

Advertising Ecosystem from MediaPost, interesting article.

Friday, September 15, 2006

Slippery slope

I was thinking about all those occasions when I have either driven me or depressed me? The one and only thing I thought was common between the two was “Ego”… the green monster!

Posted by Picasa

Thursday, September 14, 2006

Don’t chew my ear!

One my most favorite poem is William Shakespeare’s “To thine own self be true” from Hamlet. Polonius speaks to his son Laertes before his travels…

Yet here, Laertes! aboard, aboard, for shame!
The wind sits in the shoulder of your sail,
And you are stay'd for. There; my blessing with thee!
And these few precepts in thy memory
See thou character. Give thy thoughts no tongue,
Nor any unproportioned thought his act.
Be thou familiar, but by no means vulgar.
Those friends thou hast, and their adoption tried,
Grapple them to thy soul with hoops of steel;
But do not dull thy palm with entertainment
Of each new-hatch'd, unfledged comrade. Beware
Of entrance to a quarrel, but being in,
Bear't that the opposed may beware of thee.
Give every man thy ear, but few thy voice;
Take each man's censure, but reserve thy judgment.
Costly thy habit as thy purse can buy,
But not express'd in fancy; rich, not gaudy;
For the apparel oft proclaims the man,
And they in France of the best rank and station
Are of a most select and generous chief in that.
Neither a borrower nor a lender be;
For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.
This above all: to thine ownself be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.
Farewell: my blessing season this in thee!

As marketers we’ve been getting a far smaller share of the consumer’s ears these days than we ever did and that percentage continues to drop at an alarming rate.

The clutter often feels like some one chewing on my ear than a valuable message, don’t you think?

Now that's a good recipe for success

CREATIVE RISK TAKING

People Development
Understanding Risk/Taking Risk/Rewarding Behavior
Direction/Strategizing

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Don’t change for the sake of change

Gone are those days when people believed “don’t fix it if it ain’t broke”, I often challenge myself and my teams to “Think different!”. That’s not just an extension of the Apple campaign either. Organizations today strive to think and more importantly act different.

Change is not easy but it’s not a choice either! If you don’t some one else will and then you will be forced to follow.

Its one thing to innovate/change and a whole different thing to add value to the consumer. With the death of product differentiation since the introduction of distant and contract manufacturing organizations have transitioned to commercial innovation, commercial differentiation in a crowded market place and on an ever crowded shelf. As we strive to differentiate in a mass market by micro segmentation. Organizations are challenged to entice I mean it! In that moment of excitement and euphoria generated in the consumers mind clearly articulate the value of the difference.

It’s all about the value, how ever small and incremental, its all about the value! Don’t change for the sake of change but change to make a difference. Its true of my brands, your brands as it is true of brand “I” and brand “You”!

Dissociative identity marketing

This is new to me too but I liked what I read, who knows you may see the value too?

Kalivo.com - Show
Fads or Smart Marketing?

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

Price & Value

Oscar Wilde was responsible for the original form of the quote but I am not sure where I heard the following one... nonetheless I love it.

“Economists know the price of things but not the value and Marketers know the value of things but not the price”.

I recently told someone they knew the value of things but not the value of it and they lashed out at me. I had particularly chosen not to generalize the Economists and the Marketers when I said it out loud. The quote is deep and indicative of the equity the two functions have developed as cynics and romantics.

Monday, September 11, 2006

Responding to success can be more challenging than failure

Much like gravity, nothing can stand up there for perpetuity. All that goes up or even grows up there like Newton discovered will some day come down. So is the story of life. But what about the momentary euphoria from going up there, getting to the top? That can be a tough one… We humans have a natural persistence of vision, but sometimes persistence can affect our mind and brains too.

When one fails one can commit greater rigor, more focus or sometimes even change of course to get to the top, but when u are at the top the only three place to go are either further up, stay there or go down. With the three options none can stay there for ever and obviously none can grow forever. Responding to success can thus be tricky, appearing arrogant, docile or humble all have its own issues.

I guess the response is a function of the culture, the landscape and the competition.

Friday, September 08, 2006

Administration is a job unto itself

Administration is an elegant word for the corporate sludge and politics we all have to put up with. There is more to administrator then the rut! The meetings, the decisions, agreements and negotiations.

Years ago when I was a consultant I learnt a wrong lesson, you have meetings in the day and work on the real stuff in the evenings. Things were simple and easy then, I was single, I was on the road and staying late meant hitting the restaurants and bars late at night with my colleagues and buddies. I loved it, but life is different now! Work life balance is critical, and what’s more important is not just managing my work load but ensuring my team is not overloaded.

Balancing work with the rest of the load can be a tough act. Administration can be a job unto itself. I cam eup with a model to address the situation... working backwards:
7. Prioritization
6. Delegate
5. Develop talent
4. Reward diligence & commitment
3. Manage and track development planning
2. Institute and agree on a skill matrix
1. Hire the right people

Thursday, September 07, 2006

The most expensive thing in business after life itself

I was ruminating over what is the most expensive investment a business or an individual makes? My thought process got as little philosophical and so I thought it was an apt candidate for “The Blue”.

I believe the answer is F l E x I b I L i T y!

From every angle I thought of it I seemed to convince myself that the answer is flexibility, it is the cost of uncertainty combined with the luxury of maintaining options. Be it launching a new product as a premium or a flanker, setting up a new consumer driven supply network, entering a new market, all these decisions have associated risks. The classical way most businesses and people mitigate risks in their personal lives is creating fall backs. Basically a full featured execution option or at least a partially developed option that may be executed in the event of a failure in achieving desired results from the choicest selection.

In conversations as to how flexibility costs us on a personal level I have realized… think of all the money people invest in buying branded merchandise. The brands comes with a promise of meeting expected needs. Implicitly committing to the fact that if the brand failed to meet the needs the manufacturer will replace it with one that does. It is the flexibility of being sure one way or the other expectations will be met!

In a rush…

During my recent trip to India I noticed some thing quite interesting and may be even unique in its own right. People seemed to be in a rush! I am serious! This coming from me seems rather odd, given my pace. But the quirk was that this anxiety and obsession with getting things over with was unusual. Whether it was completing a task, getting somewhere, eating, visiting someone or a tourist attraction people were in a rush!

What’s with the idea of getting things done & getting them done NOW!

Does that mean we have a little extra time to squeeze in an added activity that we love… may be a couple extra minutes of that sweet sleep in the morning? It did not seem so to me?

I am not sure I have figured what it really is but one thing for certain people seemed to focus much more on task completion and much less on enjoying it. This is not about elevating ourselves beyond the mundane to the surreal but I do believe every individual needs to make a clear distinction between satisfaction and conquest!

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

My India top 11 - based on a recent trip...

The India top 11

The Good

The Bad

o Open to new ideas! Open to change!

o Conflicting performance measures across disciplines resulting in overall chaos across the system

o The opportunity is NOW! I guess the size of the population to affect something

o Need for greater organization, most things operate as islands unto themselves

o Everything is a social process, strong support system. Guess the joint family extends far & beyond

o Overly complex systems, it is no surprise every western company invested in India operates as a JV

o Institutions that work! Financial, Taxation, Post, Logistical, Information & Media, etc.

o Lack of originality, resulting in a lot of “Monkey see Monkey do”

o Faith based system with a strong culture

o Negative motivation works! The system perpetuates delivery against the fear of punishment

o

o Lack of overall trust & fear of the next person... everyone for themselves resulting in competitiveness

I just added the 11th.

Long trip to India and back now!

Couple interesting posting on FastCompany, Business Week, etc.

Putting a price on customer opinion - FC
If size really mattered... - BW
It's time for a McD, I am loving it - ChicagoBusiness
Posted by Picasa

Look for my top 10 on India, I am just about done compiling.

How to Be a Better CMO

ANA Marketing Maestros: How to Be a Better CMO

very interesting read!

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

You've got baggage....

It is funny when friends write to you about the reclusive Russian who declined the Field medal. Reminds you that no matter what you do today... you still have ties with the field you left behind.

Reclusive genius spurns math prize

these are kinds they make movies on...

Monday, August 14, 2006

Multi-tasking or food for ADHD?

Interesting article about Gen Y ladies: Girls Just Want to Be Plugged In -- to Everything from the Los Angeles Times.

Saturday, August 12, 2006

Google Games

Fancy Games - Fast Company Now
from who else but Google.

Thursday, August 10, 2006

Wealth of Knowledge!

The latest issue of http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/ has some fantastic articles and books - must reads for the summer.

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

Tasseomancy

Tasseomancy is the ancient art of reading tea leaves. The practice of drinking tea was associated with meditation in the East and the configuration of tea leaves in the cup after drinking reflected the state of the world at that particular moment. Anyway enough about the ancients, lets talk modern times. Management today is not much different from this age old art form. Reading hidden messages, understanding & interpreting body language, I can go on and on.

Nature is supreme; as such it is not strange we expect certain traits in individuals we hire for positions. A little gray hair, stern voice & a firm grip will go a long way. Although people are people, each of them speaks their very own unique lingo, they act different, they offer different responses to situations.

The task of reading and interpreting their behaviors can be daunting. Understanding when they need help, what kind of help, how to offer and approach them for help is an art. I have wondered if we couldn’t have a tasseomant in every office that read the tea leaves of every employee just to make the managers life easy. Do we call it performance review by any chance?

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Squeezing the lemon

I think hiring is by far the most difficult task in ones career? In my personal experience I have found it to be more difficult than making multi million dollar and sometimes multi billion dollar choices for corporations. It is not just identifying the candidate, but asking them the right questions, evaluating their responses and finally making the critical ‘go’, ‘no go’ decisions on the right cultural fit, right skill set, the right attitude, the energy, passion and much more. Yet another element of challenge is the urge to satisfy a short term business need or developing a leader.

I remember hearing staggering statistics on investments organizations make in developing leaders that way too often result in a regretted loss to another organization worse yet to a competitor and yet that’s not the worst scenario… try inheriting a dysfunctional team and misfit individuals only to be told ‘it is what it is’, now work it out. I call it, ‘Squeezing the lemon’. Talk about tough calls!

Alls not lost though, there is hope. I have always believed, ‘until there is hope there is life’. Squeezing the lemon is tough, but with a positive attitude and a passion to succeed there is a way. Here is what I have found works.

  • Partner at every level with the team/members and their bosses
  • Train the team, even if they don’t see any immediate value
  • Keep trying, trying, trying and trying to show them the light
  • Provide specific solutions not constructs
  • Communicate to build trust
  • If nothing else works make a firm, decisive and clear impression by firing the trouble makers/misfits!

Monday, August 07, 2006

Career elasticity of growth & movement

As a marketer and strategist I often look at elasticities of my brands. In order to time events for the greatest impact, and improve my ROI, I juggle many balls, advertising, promotions, partnerships, equity alliances, etc.

During a recent review I noticed similarities between the elasticity of demand curve and careers. As marketers we never price brands on the inelastic part of the curve, because it would be stupid to leave money on the table. We are taught to be sensitive to thresholds where consumers question the benefit and price of the brand (the value). Lastly we learn to pay special attention to the gap between our price and that of our closest competitors.

I decided to apply the same principles to my career and mapped the career elasticity of growth!


 Posted by Picasa

what goes around comes around

Interesting article on the wisdom of crowds.

Workers, place your bets from Business Week.

If you remember my posting "Some of my interesting bookmarks" from June 2006

Friday, August 04, 2006

Do unto others as you would have them do unto you – What about CANDOR?

I have always tried hard & practiced treating others the way I wish to be treated by them. Only recently I noticed something strange when a project with little merit received unanimous support, then again every project received kudos. I stopped to think what was really going on? It really struck a cord when I realized it was a case of you scratch my back and I scratch yours. BUT WHAT ABOUT OPEN HONEST TALK?

Most people are smart and intelligent but sometimes too intelligent for their own good. That’s when things back fire, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”; if you say good things about my project I will say great things about yours! Is this a cultural thing? Can our corporate cultures fix what our religious, societal cultures have indoctrinated us with? I certainly think so! The legendary Jack Welch of GE said it once reward people and behaviors that align with objectives and values and punish the ones that don’t. This applies as much to the top performers as the bottom dwellers in every organization.

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

In Search of Courage

Who else by John McCain - Some of these reprinted FastCompany articles are amazing! In Search of Courage: "John McCain"

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Organization & controls

I have always believed sound organizations need - internal discipline; resulting in strong brands, great people and social responsibility & and external control for strategy and objectivity; board of directors, PR people and investors. Together they go a long way! I consider myself an organization (of one) an institution (with brands ME, principles, values & purpose), so why not emulate? In my effort to get started I made the following list.

Internal control:

BRANDING (equity, quality & packaging) – First & Second moment of truth!
o What is my equity? How would someone describe me? & Competition
o How do people perceive me? What is my image like? & Competition
o How do I project myself? & Competition
o My messages, how I speak, the people I associate with, how I look, what I wear? & Competition

SKILL, TALENT & GENIUS
o How I lead & develop my team? & Competition
o How are my results I deliver & my communication? & Competition
o Capabilities I possess? & Competition
o Capacity I have? & Competition
o Time I manage, work I prioritize? & Competition

SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
o How I lead & develop my team? & Competition
o My commitment to my people, my community, my fraternity? & Competition

External control:

OBJECTIVITY
o Mentors as my board of directors
o Strong partners, coaches as my investors & bankers

Let’s get cracking!

Built to Flip

Jim Collins is great! -
Built to Flip: "author of 'Built to Last: Success"

bad PR... you think?

This month's ANA had a full page ad and I could not resist but blog it.

A little extreme but effective career/personal espionage.

That Girl Emily

Manager Tools

Fastinating blog and an equally interesting podcast! Manager Tools

Conversations… conversations… conversations…

I learn more from talking to people then from anything else. Last weekend I met some one; he asked me what I did for a living. I blurted “Management”, I thought for a second… that’s my first. I typically respond with more specific about what I do or who I work for, etc. Interesting response must have been subconscious… This individual asked me what I meant by “Management”? Now I needed to respond with something that fit with my previous answer. I responded "I am in the business of leadership and people". That was the most apt answer I could think of at the time. Certainly very true! My role is all about my people, leading them, setting direction & managing change.

Saturday, July 29, 2006

Friday, July 28, 2006

Leadership is generational

There is a lot of hoopla about change management and leadership, NO denying ANY organization would not exist let alone succeed in absence of strong leadership and an effective change management program that weathers changing strategies, organizational structures, market conditions, etc. What’s worrisome thought is the perspective a lot of business graduates and business managers have about change and leadership. As life gets faster business graduates and managers expect an equally fast turn on change and leadership. It is not as fast and easy as downloading a good book on change and leadership on to your iPod listening or reading through the pages of the HBR and knowing all that there is to know about change and leadership. The Titanic does not change course in an instant! I am particularly skeptical of the turnaround experts, not to say short term goals don’t matter but they come at a cost and that cost will be adequately compensated with some depression in the long run.

We see leaders, read about them, hear about them, talk about them, even study their decisions and try to emulate them. What one takes away may or may not be the same the next person takes away. Not too long ago I had a good friend who visited a conference where the legendary Jack Welch presented. I adore Jack’s leadership and business acumen; have been a huge fan forever! When this friend mentioned he wanted to get a business degree only because he heard Jack mention ‘today’s managers need to develop people skill’, I thought what on earth! Coming from Jack sounded a little strange, the same person who had such a public divorce, which only got messier in the media... & people skills.

I believe the truth is we need all the knowledge there is, our own vision combined with a STRONG heart to be patient and persist at the mission/vision, make the TOUGH decisions. A little steering every so often, engagement and energy & the organization will see the light on the horizon. Changing people’s philosophies, ideology and thoughts takes generations. Leadership is a philosophical, Leadership is generational!

Thursday, July 27, 2006

Modularity - Life’s little resets!

Yesterday was a hectic day... I woke up on time but with all the little things I had to complete I was late for my train, lucky me I still made it. By the time I reached my transfer point I was back on track. Things went smooth only until I got to office and I had to put out a fire that seemed to derail my entire day’s schedule, once again lucky me half way down the day one of my meeting was cancelled and I got an hour of my ever so important life back. I was cruising just fine. On my way back home I reflected on my day all the mini crises I had to deal with, the fires I had to put out, plans I had to make and objectives I had met.

My reflection led me to the thought of resets! How modular is life, the decoupling helps and hurts. Clearly the modularity allows for those quick and easy resets in life that enable us to reload and fire. How great is that! A perfect opportunity to reset and start all over again. Not all disruptions result in the same level of resilience from life. The classic was 9-11, life was crippled for days, travelers within the US and a number of cases globally were stranded, but things eventually bounce back.

Is our modular lifestyle offering options for resets or is life just getting more resilient from all the shocks and experience?

In an age of creativity-design-innovaiton

Posted on The Donald Trump blog - My Candidates to Replace the MBA

I am not a fan of Mr. Trump's blog but this is an interesting article by Tom Peters.

Promises, Lies and Apologies: Is It Possible to Restore Trust?

Interesting reseasrch from: Knowledge@Wharton -
Promises, Lies and Apologies: Is It Possible to Restore Trust?
"Trust is critical for organizations, effective management and efficient negotiations, yet trust violations are common"

"It's okay to screw me over, but don't deceive me as well," says Bradlow. "If you screw me over and lie about it, it's going to take even longer to recover from it."


The authors say

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

The business of influence

The podcasts at the University of Chicago are fascinating. Here is from Steven Levitt.

Steven Levitt, Alvin H. Baum Professor in Economics at the University of Chicago and author of the New York Times bestseller Freakonomics, regaled the students with cases from his research. One example illustrated why Chicago emphasizes the importance of hard data for all kinds of decision-making.

MP3 File

Badge of shame

Ever had one of those days when you thought you worked on a presentation for a role model and intended to impress only to be pointed juvenile mistakes in the presentation? Juvenile is probably an understatement. Everything came crashing from mistakes in charts to assumptions that did not address the issue in question, the most devastating was when 'common sense checks' in the presentation fell apart!

Rough, Rough, Rough... You bounce back! Life goes on!

In any case the best thing one can do is seek feedback, take the feedback personally and apply. I decided I would go back to my role model and acknowledge my mistakes, take responsibilities to redeem myself. Work to build my equity all over again. It was rough!

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

No One Knows What They're Doing

No One Knows What They're Doing - interesting read

Fast Company suggests trying:

1. Practice admitting when you're stuck or don't know what you're doing (perhaps in safer environments at first).
2. Open up to others to help you begin to find answers to your challenges.
3. Begin to notice the sense of freedom that can come from not having to "know" all the time.

Vanishing enemy

Every time I listen to the news these I am amazed at the similarity between guerrilla wars (particularly the from the fundamentalist organizations) and the private label consumer product labels war games. A few years ago I had the opportunity to dig through some old data before and around the second big war. The issues of brand wars were similar then as they are now. The lions always have to keep up with the nimble young gazelles; of course the modern gazelles have sharp teeth and paws of the lion, and a large number competing for the same opportunities. What makes it particularly difficult is the modern day relationship the lions have with the gazelles, acting as customers and competitors at the same time.

There are obviously three obvious courses most organizations take to deal with the challenges, driven by their equity, their relationships and lastly their strengths. Going after the gazelles versus other lions; Ignoring the gazelles and concentrating on other lions that feast on their opportunities; or Going after other lions while keeping an eye on the gazelles in case there arises an opportunity to pounce and feast on them. All of this does not seem much different from global politicking.

Obviously the gazelle does not make for much of a feast when you are a large lion unless you can round up an entire herd, but that would be pretty tough given their agility and deceptive roles. It certainly makes best sense to drive other lions to enable proliferation of the other opportunities in the view, as long as the lions have enough cubs to go after the gazelles and limit their activity to specific regions. The cubs can keep the Gazelles busy from sharpening and penetrating their teeth into any of the lions. Much like what Queen Maria Theresa did during her reign as the queen mother of Austria.

Monday, July 24, 2006

Trust is a corporate speak for consistency

Had the opportunity to read Patrick Lencioni’s Five Dysfunctions of a team. Pat starts with the first dysfunction, “Absence of Trust”, I felt good… that means it fits with my model of building credibility. I was interested in knowing what Pat mean by TRUST? He says trust is not about letting yourself fall on your team member and expecting them to hold you, instead it means being able to predict people’s behavior in various situations consistently, the trust that they will make predictably right choices.

I processes what I had read the thought lead me think of the only document one carries along through out ones careers from the point in time one is hired until they retire. Our RESUME! We the schools one attended to organizations and roles. Our alma maters are associated with the effort it takes to be accepted and the commitment it requires to get through. The organizations one worked for and the progression through out the career is the next major element. Once again projecting to the reviewer ones commitment, passion and consistency in delivering results. Within every role one has held individuals talk about their success, the challenges, adjustments they make as a reflection of the performance they will likely deliver in the role they transition into.

Does this mean we have just created a corporate buzz for consistency? May be what we mean by trust is really consistency?